China is experiencing a trade war without smoke. Putting forward this statement is by no means a hostile attitude towards the outside world. Such an era has passed, and it should not be the presupposition of China's going to the world; it is by no means an expression of anger-green nationalism that is a bit of a distinction between factions. Under the leadership of the two "leaders" in Europe and the United States, developing countries and regions have adopted anti-dumping and other trade protectionism behaviors against China. However, we do not have to enumerate here. The data in the table is sufficient to show that China faced in 2012. The international trading environment and some of the dilemmas encountered in bilateral trade. Why is this? Why is the external world unhappy with China? What should China do? Although it is impossible to decouple from politics in any field, including the economic field, China, which has undergone more than 30 years of reform and opening up, has experienced complicated and complicated ideological debates. After that, today, for the actions of European and American countries, it is no longer necessary to speculate in the way of "conspiracy theory." Instead, we need to think more about economic protection thinking to consider trade protectionism in Europe and the United States and other countries. In this way, we can more objectively see the cause of the incident, so that it is possible to take targeted measures, including the advancement at the international political level. In the final analysis, adhering to its own national interests is the premise of European and American actions. Ass determines the head and is the truth in the relationship between nations. In Western countries that elect politics, pleasing voters to get votes in their hands is a domestic political consideration for many economic behaviors. The EU and the United States have filed a lawsuit against the World Trade Organization on China's restrictions on the export of strategic raw materials. At the time, the US trade representative Kirk, who appeared in the proceedings, stressed the importance of US-China trade when he delivered a speech at the US-China Trade Committee. At the same time, it also warned in an unusually strong tone that the United States puts the interests of American business and workers first and will take "more active measures" to safeguard US interests in trade with China. I have always believed that the behaviors of developed countries in Europe and the United States need to be treated differently. In the fields of institution building, human rights protection, and speech ideas, we have a lot to learn; their words against China are not all illusory, behind them. With some firm ideas, we need to see the rationality, legitimacy and our own improvements. However, there is nothing to say in the economic field. The maintenance of national interests, corporate interests and citizens' interests is the most basic and fundamental. There is a Chinese saying that "there is no benefit, no early". If you can't benefit from it in trade behavior, no country will act actively, and the political will will not be unimpeded in the economic field. Hans Morgenthau (American), a master of realism in international relations theory, told people half a century ago that in the face of safeguarding national interests, there should be no illusions about political rhetoric. Especially in the 60 years after World War II, Western developed countries have already led a series of rules of the game in the international economic field. According to these rules of the game, the economic behavior adopted by the state is usually expressed as irrelevant to politics. In such a discourse environment, it is not difficult to see that many countries will tell the world when they adopt trade protectionism measures against China: We are doing things according to the rules of the game, and political protests are unreasonable. Practically speaking, during the 11 years since China joined the World Trade Organization, it has learned a lot from it after paying no mathematics fees, but it is not yet mature enough. This process will continue for a while, and it will be a pain in China's integration into the world. In the economic sense alone, in the face of trade protectionism, the response measures adopted at the government level are not strong enough. The overall political considerations are sometimes greater than the actual economic considerations, and always want to control the dispute within a certain range. The guiding philosophy has hampered the strength of counter-measures. But in fact, some disputes in the economic field will not affect the overall situation of relations between countries. Moreover, from the international practice in recent years, only general trade, not munitions, will not lead to comprehensive relations between countries. deterioration. Moreover, in the process of being familiar with the rules of the international game, we are also using the rules to formulate our own action plans, which can be placed on the table, and can be solved in the program through international means such as arbitration. Of course, since it is bilateral trade and multilateral trade, after problems have arisen, we must also review and adjust our own situation so as to be able to persuade the international community in international competition. In 2012, the trade protectionism against China has reached a new order of magnitude. There is a big background: the economic crisis triggered by the financial crisis has not ended in this world. From this background, the behavior of trade protectionism has increased greatly. It’s not a matter of “being surprisingly good at shootingâ€. Looking at the international economic field before World War I and before World War II, this is not the case. At a time when the world economy is sluggish or when there are big problems, the state of the jungle between countries begins to appear, ensuring that the days of their own countries are not too sad, and that they are considered by priority countries. It is customary to mobilize trade protectionist measures to ensure the employment of their citizens and the production and marketing of enterprises. In this sense, the first economic crisis of this century, the solution routines used by countries are still the consistent means of the last century, and there is really nothing new under the sun. On a larger scale, trade protection is not only directed at China, but also exists among other countries, even among developed countries, but the intensity and intensity are not like those against China. However, we also need to see that the economic crisis is only a phased background. The protectionist measures against China will not disappear with the disappearance of the economic crisis, but will be so for a long time because China is in the economy. The rise of the level and the external world are structurally flawed. From the development history of international relations, the rise of any great power will lead to the discovery of the instinctual panic of international power, trying to maintain the existing state of balance of power, and is the strategy of leading the existing international order. Japan after the Meiji Restoration, Germany after the First World War, and China after the Second World War are no exceptions. The international community needs a process to adapt and recognize the power of a certain country, and this process is a process of constantly breaking through the constraints and constantly showing strength for the rising power. This is the case in China, especially in the case of China's industrial upgrading and structural adjustments are not in place. Therefore, China will continue to face such international realities in the future. This aspect needs to adjust itself. On the other hand, it needs to be more adept at using internationally recognized means to safeguard its own interests. In a broader sense, the process of China's integration into the world is not over yet, and this process of integration has more to do with the economics of the outside world. Recognizing this, we can argue more peacefully, without being influenced by some emotional expressions in the country and the power to change the perception of the international community.
Magnetic Knife Holder,Magnetic Tool Holder,Magnetic Assembly
Hawell Magnetics Co., Ltd. , http://www.nbdfebmagnetic.com